The phrase "accountability in practice" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how accountability is implemented or demonstrated in real-world situations or actions.
Example: "The organization emphasizes accountability in practice by regularly reviewing team performance and providing constructive feedback."
Alternatives: "responsibility in action" or "accountability in action".
Not having a coach meant that there was less accountability in practice.
Essential to operationalize the concept of shared decision making is the creation of an infrastructure that promotes collaborative and collegial relationships and a nurturing, learning environment to foster accountability in practice at all levels.
In theory, DRGs enhance transparency and accountability; in practice, however, their inherent characteristics make them prone to 'gaming' the system.
Accountability in practice is often underpinned by a Principal-Agent logic: based on lead-subordinate roles, relations are structured to incentivize Agents to act in the interests of the Principal or lead [ 3].
The Saturday Night Massacre demonstrated how that accountability worked in practice.
Considered together with how respondents reacted to assessment in theoretical modules [ 11], it seems evident that regular accountability in clinical practice modules played a central role in determining students' overall learning pattern and had a negative knock-on effect on learning in subsequent theoretical modules.
Strategies that had medium importance and feasibility ratings included: resolving concerns about liability and accountability in collaborative practice; recruiting international trained therapists; opportunity to work in different settings; interprofessional payment schemes; family leave; staff recognition and creating a position for a provincial health professional recruiter.
"As I shifted into a management role, there was a different type of accountability in how each practice and the entire health network of clinics functioned.
In practice, accountability has been characterised as a 'political theatre' where institutional structures, power asymmetries and inter-organisational dynamics combine to ensure that "no single form of accountability dominates" [ 9].
However, as both a concept and in practice, accountability is infused with different meanings, criteria and standards depending on who uses the term, whether managers, policy makers, researchers, advocates, or health professionals.
Citing a recent New York Times series on lawlessness at sea, lawmakers have asked fishing and pet food companies to increase transparency and accountability in their labor practices.
