The phrase "account of judgment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing a report or explanation regarding a decision or ruling made by a judge or authority.
Example: "The lawyer provided a detailed account of judgment to explain the court's reasoning behind the verdict."
Alternatives: "report of the decision" or "summary of the ruling".
Whichever sense we take, this is a misreading — and an impossible one, if we take 'internal' in Russell's sense, because of Bradley's rejection of the subject/predicate account of judgment as 'erroneous'erroneous
Despite these significant steps in the direction of later logical theories, it is an exaggeration to claim, as some have done, that Bradley's strictures on the account of judgment as a combination of ideas mean that he is straightforwardly opposed to psychologism in logic, for it is clear that he thinks logic's subject matter to be mental acts, not sentences or statements.
Accordingly much of the secondary literature on Kant's aesthetics has treated it in isolation from the more general account of judgment in which it is embedded, and the same is true, perhaps to an even greater extent, in the case of Kant's teleology.
Bradley's own account of judgment is that it is 'the act which refers an ideal content... to a reality beyond the act', so that the logical form of every judgment is 'Reality is such that, if anything is S then it is P'.
On that basis, I will build my account of judgment oscillation in addicts.
Significantly, when it came into force in 2000, the 1998 act allowed the courts of the United Kingdom, for the first time, to interpret and apply the convention, requiring them to "take account" of judgments of the European court of human rights in Strasbourg.
In the first part of this essay, we will look at the particularly rich account of judgments of beauty given to us by Immanuel Kant.
The most distinctive part of Kant's aesthetic theory, and the part which has aroused most interest among commentators, is his account of judgments of beauty, and, more specifically, pure judgments of beauty.
As noted at the end of Section 2.2, Kant's account of judgments of beauty has been criticized on the grounds that the argument for their universal validity, that is the Deduction of Pure Aesthetic Judgments, is unsuccessful.
It might be supposed from this that Kant's core account of judgments of beauty is only peripherally applicable to art, which would make it largely irrelevant to the concerns of contemporary aesthetics.
