accords on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "accords on" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct expression would be "accord on" or "accords with." Example: "The two countries reached an accord on trade agreements."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

Global finance favours common standards, such as the Basel accords on bank capital.

The Economist

Mr Clinton put their minds at rest by adding side accords on labour and the environment.

The Economist

By themselves, the accords on Colombia, Peru and Panama are not considered economically significant.

The New York Times

"The peace accords on indigenous rights were the least implemented," Mr. Koenigs said.

The New York Times

The accords on cross-strait transportation give China's leaders a chance to show hardline nationalists that their tactics are working.

The Economist

The new Basel accords on bank capital may even give rating agencies a bigger role in determining how much capital banks set against loans.

The Economist

Mr. Sonnenfeldt produced "thoughtful and penetrating papers" on Russian intentions in the Middle East and the Helsinki Accords on human rights, among other issues, Dr. Kissinger said.

The New York Times

Richard Holbrooke, who negotiated the Bosnian peace accords on behalf of President Clinton, saw the Administration's reluctance to take effective action in Yugoslavia as a failure of realism.

The New Yorker

The Basel Accords on capital adequacy, which set a common floor for banks' capital, are an example of how national regulators can agree to near-global rules.

The Economist

Two other accords, on customs co-operation and on trade in chemicals used for illicit drugs, were signed in The Hague.

The Economist

Seabrook's piece ran around the same time that the Bush Administration was pulling out of the Kyoto Protocol accords on greenhouse gases.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While "accords on" is frequently used, consider using "accord on" or "accords with" for grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using the plural form "accords" with the preposition "on" when referring to a specific agreement. Opt for "accord on" or rephrase to use "accords with" to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "accords on" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun by specifying the subject or area that the agreements relate to. Despite its common usage, Ludwig AI marks this construction as grammatically questionable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

80%

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "accords on" is frequently used to indicate agreements or treaties concerning a specific subject. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically questionable; the more accurate forms are "accord on" or "accords with". Despite being common in news media and encyclopedias, particularly in discussions of international relations and policy, writers should consider opting for grammatically precise alternatives like "agreement on" or rephrasing to use "accords with" for improved clarity and correctness. The term's neutral register makes it suitable for various contexts, but awareness of its grammatical nuance is essential.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreements concerning

Focuses on the shared understanding and mutual arrangements, replacing "accords" with "agreements" and keeping the meaning of "on" with "concerning".

consensus regarding

Highlights the collective agreement and shared opinion, replacing "accords" with "consensus" and "on" with "regarding".

agreement regarding

Focuses on the element of consensus and mutual understanding, replacing "accords" with "agreement" and "on" with "regarding".

understandings about

Focuses on the mutual comprehension aspect of the agreement, replacing "accords" with "understandings" and "on" with "about".

arrangements concerning

Highlights the planned and organized nature of the agreement, substituting "accords" with "arrangements" and "on" with "concerning".

settlements relating to

Emphasizes the resolution aspect of the agreement, replacing "accords" with "settlements" and "on" with "relating to".

contracts pertaining to

Emphasizes the legally binding aspect of the agreement, substituting "accords" with "contracts" and "on" with "pertaining to".

pacts covering

Underscores the formal and binding nature of the agreement, substituting "accords" with "pacts" and "on" with "covering".

treaties addressing

Highlights the international and formal nature of the agreement, replacing "accords" with "treaties" and "on" with "addressing".

conventions dealing with

Stresses the established and customary nature of the agreement, substituting "accords" with "conventions" and "on" with "dealing with".

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to use "accords on"?

While commonly used, especially in news media, Ludwig AI identifies "accords on" as grammatically questionable. Consider using "accord on" or "accords with" for better grammatical precision.

What are some alternatives to "accords on"?

You can use alternatives like "agreement on", "consensus on", or "pacts covering" depending on the context.

How does "accord on" differ from "accords with"?

"Accord on" typically refers to a specific agreement or settlement. "Accords with", on the other hand, indicates that something is in agreement or harmony with something else.

When should I use "agreement on" instead of "accords on"?

"Agreement on" is a suitable alternative when you want to emphasize the mutual understanding or consensus reached regarding a particular issue or topic. It is generally considered grammatically sound.