The phrase "according to this scale" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referencing a specific measurement or evaluation system to provide context or justification for a statement or conclusion.
Example: "According to this scale, the temperature is considered to be in the moderate range."
Alternatives: "based on this scale" or "in line with this scale".
According to this scale, an event with a magnitude of 5.1 corresponds to a nuclear weapon with a yield between 5 and 7 kilotons.
According to this scale, people are materialistic to the extent that they place acquiring possessions at the center of their lives, judge success by the number and quality of one's possessions, and see these possessions as vital to happiness (for instance, they agree with statements like "My life would be better if I owned certain things I don't have").
This means, according to this scale, that many people found it difficult to stand.
According to this scale, five factors were considered in every composition: 1. Content, 2. Organization, 3. Vocabulary, 4. Language Use, and 5. Mechanics.
According to this scale, patients in the non-lithium group (7.86 ± 5.86) were more severely depressed than those in the lithium group (4.61 ± 3.13) (p = 0.02).
According to this scale, the prevalence of APD is two to three times that of psychopathy".
Never having got over her father's fall, she was aware of the irony in her position: "There is such an attempt to introduce distinctions here and to class our society it is to me perfectly sickening—I am the reputed author of it which is the most laughable part of it as my own family connections rank according to this new scale among the inadmissibles".
Never having got over her father's fall, she was aware of the irony in her position: "There is such an attempt to introduce distinctions here and to class our society it is to me perfectly sickening — I am the reputed author of it which is the most laughable part of it — as my own family connections rank according to this new scale among the inadmissibles".
According to this time scale, the group mean P1gap, N1gap, and P2gap latencies and the 95% confidence limits for the mean were 61±4, 105±5, and 168±8 ms, respectively in the young group, 60±4, 104±4, and 163±8 in the middle-aged, and 64±4, 113±5, and 172±6 ms in the older group.
11 12 36 According to this generic scale, children had, on the whole, less manual ability than adults.
Thus evaluating according to this perceptual scale means developing different 4-class classifiers, one for each trait.
