according to Apple

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "according to Apple" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to attribute information or statements to Apple as a source or authority. Example: "According to Apple, the new iPhone model will feature improved battery life and enhanced camera capabilities."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

According to Apple, 70percentt of iOS devices accessing the App Store are running iOS 9.

TechCrunch

According to Apple, Mr.

The New York Times

According to Apple acolytes, Macs are really, really user-friendly.

The New Yorker

The processor, with a new design, is twice as fast, according to Apple.

The New York Times

The UK's new spying powers could have "very dire consequences", according to Apple boss Tim Cook.

Independent

According to Apple, it's simply too big for its new, super-thin, super-packed gadgets.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

15 human-written examples

According to ABC, "G.M.A".

The New York Times

According to The Associated Press Von.

The New York Times

action, according to Reuters.

The New York Times

Very, according to OECD officials.

Independent

national team, according to FIFA.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "according to Apple" to clearly attribute information, especially when presenting data, statements, or claims made by the company. This ensures transparency and allows readers to assess the information's source.

Common error

Avoid beginning too many consecutive sentences with "according to Apple". Vary your sentence structure by rephrasing or embedding the attribution within the sentence to maintain reader engagement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "according to Apple" functions as an attribution phrase, indicating the source of the information being presented. Ludwig AI confirms its role in specifying the origin of a statement or claim.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Academia

1%

Science

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "according to Apple" is a grammatically sound and frequently used attribution phrase, as Ludwig AI indicates. Its primary function is to clearly identify Apple as the source of specific information, claims, or statements. It is most commonly found in news and media contexts, ensuring transparency and credibility when reporting on Apple-related topics. While perfectly acceptable, varying your sentence structure to avoid repetitive use of "according to Apple" is advisable. Alternative phrases, such as "Apple states" or "Apple reports", can add variety to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

According to Apple's statement

More formal and emphasizes a specific public declaration.

Apple confirms

Indicates that Apple is verifying the truth of information.

Apple states

Direct attribution, more concise.

Apple has indicated

Suggests a less direct or formal communication.

Apple reports

Implies a formal announcement or documented information.

As Apple explains

Focuses on Apple's reasoning or justification.

Apple notes

Suggests Apple is bringing attention to a specific detail.

Apple claims

Suggests the information might be contested or require verification.

In Apple's view

Highlights Apple's perspective or opinion.

Per Apple

A shortened, more informal version of "according to Apple".

FAQs

How can I use "according to Apple" in a sentence?

You can use "according to Apple" to introduce information or statements that Apple has provided. For example, "According to Apple, the new iPhone boasts a significantly improved camera."

What's a more formal alternative to "according to Apple"?

More formal alternatives include "as stated by Apple" or "Apple reports", which are suitable for academic or professional writing.

Is it always necessary to use "according to Apple" when citing Apple's claims?

Yes, using "according to Apple" is crucial for clearly attributing information and avoiding plagiarism. It's especially important when discussing potentially subjective or promotional statements by Apple.

Can I use "according to Apple" if the information is widely known?

While widely known information might not always require direct attribution, using "according to Apple" can still be beneficial for clarity and to indicate the original source of the information, especially if it's a specific claim or statistic.