The phrase "accommodate science" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the need to adjust or make provisions for scientific principles, practices, or advancements in a particular context.
Example: "The new policy aims to accommodate science by integrating research findings into educational curricula."
Alternatives: "support scientific inquiry" or "adapt to scientific needs".
EPA's structure "has not accommodated science at the level it needs to be," Risser says.
This local medical culture was not anti-laboratory-science but rather supported a characteristic way of accommodating science in clinical research and practice that blurred the boundaries between the two.
He said his main goal over the years has been to find a middle ground between fundamentalism and secularism, saying the church must find a way to accommodate modern science if it is to survive.
In this spirit, Shagrir (2014) complains that mechanistic computationalism does not accommodate cognitive science explanations that are simultaneously computational and representational.
Our nation should develop domestic and international energy and environmental policies that are sufficiently flexible to accommodate advancing science, tipping points and apparent changes in weather which now threaten life, the environment, property, the economy and our infrastructure.
To accommodate new science, they should be easily expandable (e.g. managed in a database).
A study of Indigenous Australian and Papua New Guinean health science students showed that the Indigenous university students conceptualized health and illness in a way which accommodated biomedical science within an integrated scheme of mental, physical and spiritual well-being[ 59].
Finally, in the 15 years since Dagher and BouJaoude (1997) examined how Lebanese biology majors accommodated evolutionary science with their existing religious beliefs, few researchers have extensively explored students' own articulations regarding what factors they personally consider to be important in determining their positions of acceptance or rejection of evolution.
It is against the implicit rules of this game to demand that science be changed to accommodate consciousness the point is to take science as it is and show that consciousness can be fitted into that kind of conceptual structure.
The smart and articulate apologists for theism were easily able to accommodate the challenges materialist science throws at faith.
