accommodate cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "accommodate cost" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express the idea of adjusting or including costs in a budget or plan, but it is not a commonly used expression. Example: "We need to find a way to accommodate the cost of the new software in our budget."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Science & Research

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

He admitted that some projects would be "reprioritized" this year to accommodate cost fluctuations, but would not specify which ones.

Forbes

A 1000-ton increannual annual output is associated with a 1% increase in the rate of initial adoption, suggesting that the larger the firm size, the larger the capacity of a firm to accommodate cost increases.

Agricultural and Food Economics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Last night lawmakers from both the House of Representatives and the Senate issued a final spending bill for NASA and several other federal agencies that "accommodates cost growth" for the $8.7 billion telescope.

Science Magazine

Apple also recently lowered the price of the iPad 2 by $100 to $399, a sign that it is accommodating cost-conscious consumers, says Michael Holt, an analyst for Morningstar.

Huffington Post

Secondly, they often ramp up their cost base to accommodate these costs, which when a down market hits they are more effed than those that stay focused.

TechCrunch

Medallion industry officials add that vans big enough to accommodate wheelchairs cost thousands of dollars more than the minivans starting to appear in their fleets.

The New York Times

Due to its modular and hierarchical design, the solution algorithm is intuitive and able to accommodate general cost and penalty functions.

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Mr Grayling has very little room for manoeuvre: cuts of £350m to legal aid have been hugely controversial; slashing court and probation budgets still further simply to accommodate the cost of greater incarceration would be extremely unpopular, especially with the prospect of yet more public sector cuts to be announced.

BBC

Medicine has changed to accommodate the cost of the technology.

Critical Care

It can accommodate various cost distributions, does not need to be repeated at different willingness to pay levels, does not need separate regression analyses to estimate ICER confidence intervals, and can produce the cost effectiveness ellipse needed to interpret a negative ICER.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

A major limitation of the implementation of more complicated models in the field of randomised trials is the need for the analytical framework to accommodate both costs and health effects and evaluate the summary cost-effectiveness measures.

Health Economics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing financial planning, prioritize established phrases like "cover the cost" or "absorb the cost" to ensure clarity and acceptance in professional settings.

Common error

Avoid using unconventional phrases like "accommodate cost" in formal writing. This phrase may not be readily understood, leading to confusion and a perception of poor writing skills.

Linguistic Context

The phrase is intended to express the inclusion or adjustment of expenses within a financial plan. However, as pointed out by Ludwig AI, it is not standard English. The provided examples demonstrate instances where it is used to imply managing or dealing with expenses.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Science & Research

34%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "accommodate cost" aims to convey the idea of managing or including expenses, it is not considered standard English. According to Ludwig AI, more suitable alternatives include "cover the cost" or "absorb the cost". The phrase appears in news and scientific contexts, but its infrequent usage and grammatical ambiguity suggest using more established terms for clarity. For example, "manage the expenses" or "factor in the costs" could also accurately express the intent depending on the nuance you would like to achieve. Using these alternatives enhances clarity and professionalism in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cover the expense

This alternative is more straightforward and focuses on the act of paying for something.

absorb the cost

This implies integrating expenses into the existing budget or financial structure, neutralizing the impact.

manage the expenses

This alternative suggests overseeing and controlling costs effectively.

offset the expense

This alternative suggests counterbalancing costs with savings or revenue.

factor in the costs

This implies including costs when calculating or planning.

make allowances for cost

This suggests budgeting and setting aside funds to handle costs.

budget for the expenses

This implies planning a financial outlay to allocate funds for costs.

defray the cost

This suggests providing funds to alleviate or cover a portion of the expenses.

meet the expenses

This implies having sufficient funds to pay for costs.

bear the cost

This suggests accepting the responsibility of covering expenses.

FAQs

How can I correctly express the idea of including costs in a budget?

Instead of "accommodate cost", consider using phrases like "cover the cost", "absorb the cost", or "factor in the costs" to clearly convey the intention of including expenses in financial planning.

What's a more professional way to say "accommodate cost"?

For professional contexts, opt for established alternatives such as "manage the expenses", "offset the expense", or "make allowances for cost" to maintain credibility and precision.

Is "accommodate cost" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig, the phrase "accommodate cost" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's advisable to use established alternatives for clarity and accuracy.

What is the difference between "accommodate cost" and "cover the cost"?

"Cover the cost" is a commonly accepted phrase that means to provide enough money to pay for something. In contrast, "accommodate cost" is not a standard English expression and might not be readily understood.