The phrase "accessible for the reader" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the clarity or ease of understanding of a text or information for the audience.
Example: "The author made sure that the complex concepts were accessible for the reader, allowing them to grasp the material easily."
Alternatives: "reader-friendly" or "easy to understand for the reader".
deriving the transform to an explicit algebraic algebraic eigenvalue problem for a symmetric, banded matrix with bandwidth, providing the required formulas, so that an implementation of the construction is easily "accessible" for the reader, proving that the construction is always successful under the conditions (4.4) and (4.7) (which is the contents of Theorem 6.1).
This synthesis is potentially more accessible for the reader than a textual synthesis.
To keep the relationship between the model and the actual values accessible for the reader, it is common practice to provide both simulated and actual values.
While this particular ethnography is not very accessible for the lay reader, potentially excluding any non-academic individuals among his research subjects from reading his book, the invaluable stylistic recreations of faith healing and preaching over radio that Blanton includes throughout and after each chapter give a sense of being involved in these interesting charismatic worship sessions.
He furthermore praised Berger for "maintaining a high degree of theoretical sophistication" while still "remaining accessible for the average reader".
The prices are affordable not only for the libraries but also for individuals, which makes this book an easily accessible choice for the readers.
Written in a clear and engaging way, the book's concise nature also makes it accessible for the non-specialist reader, and it will especially appeal to all those who want a more just society.
Make informative or educational articles on the sites easy to understand and in simple language, so all your site content is accessible for the majority of readers.
Kidder's attempts to render it accessible to the reader make for difficult, though compelling, reading.
I "tidy" Thoreau's manuscript no more than necessary to make his work in progress accessible to the reader, and for each of my substantive alterations, I present an editorial note in the back of the volume.
