Research suggests that interim testing in this paradigm may increase accessibility of details presented in the synopsis (Thomas et al. 2010), and may result in test-potentiated learning of post-event details (Gordon & Thomas 2014).
That is, both groups of participants would be more likely to produce misinformation on the final test of memory, and less likely to produce original event details, because direct and indirect encouragement to process synopsis details would increase the temporary accessibility of those details and bias responding (cf., Thomas et al. 2010).
It is our view that changes in processing associated with misleading narrative details, as a result of interim testing, influences the accessibility of those details in memory.
Greater susceptibility to misinformation in the context of interim testing and emphasizing details suggests that both procedures may serve to increase accessibility of synopsis details, and that accessibility may influence misinformation error production on the final test.
Thomas et al. (2010) argued that interim testing may influence accessibility of post-event details.
Furthermore, the choice and level of detail of accessibility indicators in this paper is constrained as the indicators are to be estimated using outputs of the NVM-model, which provide a high spatial resolution but does not allow estimations of accessibility for different population segments.
We explore the possibilities and limitations of this bio-inspired shape morphing mechanism, by first characterizing isometric embeddings under axisymmetry, understanding the limits of embeddability, and studying in detail the accessibility of surfaces of zero and constant curvature.
Famitsu reviewers noted the level of detail from the game's direction, accessibility and wit of the story, unconventional art style, and conventional game mechanics.
A 1979 PAW article detailed the remarkable accessibility of professional artists to Princeton undergraduate students in their visual-arts classes.
The reviews allow people to note specific details about the accessibility of a certain location, and then lets others know about those nuances.
However, in Germany – like in many other European countries – detailed information on the accessibility of urban blue at the household and individual level is missing.
