The phrase "accessibility is determined" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing how the level of accessibility is established or assessed in a particular context, such as technology, architecture, or services.
Example: "In our study, we found that accessibility is determined by various factors, including design, location, and user needs."
Alternatives: "accessibility is assessed" or "accessibility is evaluated".
Modulation of gene expression by catalytic RNA requires accessible ribozyme cleavage sites in the target mRNA, and accessibility is determined by the secondary and tertiary structure of the target RNA, as affected by its interactions with cellular proteins.
Instead, accessibility is determined by evaluating the combination of all orbital parameters only limited by mission duration (less than 365 days) and round-trip Δv (less than 10 km/s).
Accessibility is determined using a 10 km buffer surrounding road and train transportation networks with the ESRI Data and Maps product [39], and a 10 km buffer surrounding settlements using the NLCD.
Accessibility is determined through calculating the proportion of the total population that is within a reasonable travel-time to a SPC location.
Lipid accessibility was determined by the appearance of the 13C label in breath carbon-dioxide (CO2), and the particles behaviour in the GI tract was investigated using non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
The attractiveness of the object was develop based on the variety of landscape in term of Land cover & physical condition of villages, meanwhile the accessibility was determined based on distance from the sub-district capital.
During developing algorithms for cellulase actions, enzyme accessibility was determined based on these parameters (data set with each glucose molecule) and action pattern of enzymes.
Nucleosome positioning and DNA accessibility were determined by micrococcal nuclease (MNaseI) and DNaseI digestion, respectively, followed by indirect-end labelling.
General data accessibility was determined through both web-based search results and direct communications with registry personnel, and assigned to 1 of 3 categories as described below.
Relative differences in SH3 domain accessibility were determined by measuring FRET between Tb-His and variable concentrations of Peptide-FL in the presence of a saturating amount of conformation-selective inhibitors.
Patient-level data accessibility was determined in a similar manner, and categorized as available (to external researchers directly or through application and review, may include usage fees); conditionally available (eg, via third party collaborators); or not available/unclear.
