The phrase "accessibility instruments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to tools or methods designed to improve accessibility for individuals with disabilities or to enhance user experience for all users.
Example: "The software includes several accessibility instruments to ensure that users with visual impairments can navigate the interface effectively."
Alternatives: "accessibility tools" or "accessibility features".
The papers in this topical collection, however, have not addressed its contribution to the actual planning practice, and potential barriers towards the use of the accessibility instruments.
Findings from a European COST Action that brought together a large network of more than 100 accessibility researchers and 80 practitioners, from 22 countries, suggest that mainly organizational barriers and lack of institutionalization of accessibility instruments, are the main causes of the lack of implementation of accessibility instruments in the planning practice [4].
A important direction for future research thus seems to be to examine how organisational and institutional barriers towards the use of different accessibility instruments have been or can be overcome in actual planning practices.
Although many different definitions and measures for the concept of accessibility exist in the literature [1, 2, 5], accessibility instruments are typically considered useful instruments for the planning practice [3].
Many planning support tools have recently been developed aimed at measuring and modelling accessibility (Accessibility Instrument or AI).
The most important barriers were the fact that, for many health concepts, outcome measures do not yet exist, as well as issues related to accessibility of instruments.
The percentages of patients being treated in accordance with each indicator at the implementation and control clinics are presented in Table 1, column 1 and 3. Some of the indicators were more often recorded in the implementation clinics; accessibility, diagnostic instrument, standardized rating scale initially and during treatment, substance/drug abuse and treatment plan.
Laboratory information management systems (LIMS) is designed considering the need of analytical laboratories to carry out the research in fast, efficient and transparent manner with better accessibility of the instruments.
The paper considers how impairments may be addressed by web design and through various personalisation instruments: accessibility features of standard browsers, proxy servers, assistive technology, application adaptors, and special purpose browsers.
Accessibility to measurement instruments (96%) is an important facilitator for using them.
SQUID has the disadvantages of limited accessibility (only two instruments in the United States and two in Europe) and the inability to study iron deposition in the other organs.
