access was recognized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "access was recognized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the acknowledgment or identification of access to a system, resource, or information. Example: "After the security check, it was confirmed that access was recognized for all authorized personnel."

✓ Grammatically correct

Emerging Infectious Diseases

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

The New York Times

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The need to improve influenza vaccine access was recognized before this controversy (4, 5 ), but Indonesia's willingness to leverage control over virus samples to provoke more multilateral responses to the access problem changed the political dynamics of this issue.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

For instance, house hold wealth was recognized as more crucial determinant than access in India [ 7].

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

I was recognized".

The New York Times

And over the last five years the importance and urgency of scientific data management and access has been recognized more broadly.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has been recognized as a promising multiple access technology for fifth generation (5G) mobile communication system.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) is recognized as a more promising middleware for EC applications among other leading candidates such as CORBA.

Journal of Systems Architecture

However, because of delegating the management of data to an untrusted cloud server in data outsourcing process, the data access control has been recognized as a challenging issue in cloud storage systems.

Future Generation Computer Systems

(Long Term Evolution) and WiMax (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) systems to be recognized as "4G" if they provided "a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed".

The New York Times

The clinical response to depression suffers from a "treatment cascade": the affected individual must access health care, be recognized clinically, initiate treatment, receive adequate treatment, and respond to treatment.

Duke University

Restricting access to means is recognized as one of the most effective strategies for preventing suicide.

European Journal of Public Health

Performing spatial analyses like those conducted here on an ongoing basis as a component of the monitoring and evaluation of the AMFm may help ensure that inequities in access to treatment are recognized and addressed.

BMC Health Services Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "access was recognized" when you want to highlight that a previously existing or newly available access has been formally acknowledged or understood.

Common error

Avoid using "access was recognized" in contexts where personal acknowledgment is intended. For example, instead of saying "I hope my access was recognized", use "I hope my presence was noted" or "I hope they knew I had access".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "access was recognized" functions as a passive construction indicating that the subject, "access", received the action of being acknowledged or identified. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms its correct usage in expressing the formal recognition of something.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "access was recognized" is a grammatically correct and usable expression signifying that a particular form of access has been acknowledged or validated. Ludwig AI supports its use in conveying formal recognition. It is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, and while not overly frequent, is employed when objectivity and clarity are important. Related phrases include "access was acknowledged" and "access was identified", offering slight variations in emphasis. Ensure the phrase aligns with its impersonal acknowledgment intent to avoid misapplication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

access was acknowledged

Replaces "recognized" with a synonym conveying a similar sense of acceptance or confirmation.

access was confirmed

Similar to 'validated', but slightly less formal and more focused on verifying its existence.

access was identified

Emphasizes the act of discovering or pinpointing the access, rather than simply acknowledging it.

access was granted

Highlights the permission given for access, rather than the recognition of its existence.

access was validated

Highlights that the access was officially confirmed or proven to be legitimate.

access was realized

Emphasizes the coming into being or fruition of the access.

access became apparent

Shifts focus to the visibility or obviousness of the access rather than its formal recognition.

the importance of access was understood

Expands the phrase to emphasize the comprehension of the access's significance.

access was established

Focuses on the creation or setting up of the access, rather than its recognition.

the need for access was established

Focuses on the demonstrated requirement for access, shifting the emphasis from simple recognition.

FAQs

How can I use "access was recognized" in a sentence?

You can use "access was recognized" to indicate that the availability or importance of access to something has been acknowledged. For example, "The need to improve influenza vaccine "access" was "recognized" before this controversy".

What phrases are similar to "access was recognized"?

Similar phrases include "access was acknowledged", "access was identified", or "access was validated", each conveying a slightly different nuance of acknowledgment.

Is it better to say "access was recognized" or "access was acknowledged"?

Both "access was recognized" and "access was acknowledged" are grammatically correct and convey similar meanings. The choice depends on the specific context and desired nuance. "Acknowledged" might suggest a more explicit or formal acceptance.

What's the difference between "access was recognized" and "access was granted"?

"Access was recognized" implies that the existence or importance of access was acknowledged, whereas "access was granted" signifies that permission to access something was given. The former focuses on acknowledgment, while the latter focuses on permission.