access was funded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "access was funded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing financial support or resources allocated for obtaining or providing access to something, such as services, programs, or facilities. Example: "The new community center was built because access was funded by a generous grant from the local government."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

The programme by diversity charity Creative Access was funded by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (Bis) until June this year, when responsibility for the apprenticeship and internship agenda was moved into the Department for Education under Theresa May's new government.

The Guardian - Money

Open Access was funded by Biogen.

CNS Drugs

This assistance and open access was funded by Otsuka Italia.

CNS Drugs

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Open Access is funded by the Wellcome Trust.

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Open Access publication was funded by Publication Funds of the TU Dresden.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Open access publication was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

The Open Access cost was funded by VR CIHR Operating Grant ROH 115213.

Globalization and Health

Publication in this Open Access journal was funded by NWO, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.

BMC Psychiatry

Open Access charge was funded by The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.

Family Practice

The open access publication was funded by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme, RICORDO project, grant number 248502.

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Page 826, Open Access: The following text should have been included in this section: "The open access publication fee was funded by Eisai Co., Ltd".

CNS Drugs

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "access was funded", ensure that the context clearly indicates what type of access is being discussed (e.g., access to education, healthcare, data).

Common error

Avoid using "access was funded" without specifying the limitations or conditions attached to that access. For example, if the funding only covers partial access or access for a specific group, make that clear.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "access was funded" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the noun "access" received financial backing. Ludwig AI identifies this as grammatically sound, conveying that resources were provided to enable entry or utilization.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "access was funded" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that financial support was provided to enable or facilitate access to a particular service or resource. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is valid and usable in written English. While relatively rare in occurrence, its usage spans across scientific, news, and formal business contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the type of access and any associated limitations. Alternatives such as "funding was allocated for access" or "financial support was provided for access" can provide more formal options.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

funding was allocated for access

Reorders the sentence to emphasize the allocation of funds.

access received financial support

Shifts the focus to 'access' as the recipient of support.

access benefited from funding

Highlights the positive outcome of the funding.

funds were provided for access

Uses 'funds' as the subject to emphasize financial resources.

access was financially supported

Replaces 'funded' with a more descriptive adjective phrase.

resources were allocated to enable access

Emphasizes the resources and their enabling role.

access initiatives were funded

Specifies that 'initiatives' related to access received funding.

financial backing was provided for access

Uses a more formal tone with 'financial backing'.

access arrangements were subsidized

Replaces 'funded' with 'subsidized', implying partial funding.

monetary assistance supported access

Uses 'monetary assistance' for a more formal and specific term.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "access was funded" to sound more formal?

You can use alternatives such as "funding was allocated for access", "financial support was provided for access", or "resources were allocated to enable access" for a more formal tone.

What does it mean when it's stated that "access was funded"?

It means that financial resources were provided to enable or support access to something, such as a service, program, or facility. The specific type of access should be clarified in the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "access was funded"?

Yes, "access was funded" is grammatically correct. It uses the passive voice to indicate that access received financial support.

What are some common reasons why "access was funded"?

Common reasons include government initiatives, charitable donations, research grants, or organizational budgets aimed at improving availability or affordability of a specific service or resource.