The phrase "access was described" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how access to something was explained or detailed in a particular context, such as a report or study.
Example: "In the research paper, access was described in terms of the various methods used to gather data from participants."
Alternatives: "access was outlined" or "access was detailed".
The current system, which allows businesses in cities to claim up to £3,000 to improve their internet access, was described as "unbalanced".
Access was described as 'the collective good'.
Talking therapies were highlighted by almost half as important in supporting recovery, although access was described as poor.
Access was described as improved by some participants based on "the premise that women, as child bearers, will require family housing".
The LCNSs worked differently across sites according to local context, referral pathways to specialist treatment centres, resources and the population demographics, but there were commonalities in terms of how their impact on treatment access was described.
Another Open Access approach was described by John Nickerson, editor of Emory University's Molecular Vision, which has been freely available on the Internet since its first issue in October 1995.
A channel estimation technique that can simultaneously estimate channel frequency response and timing misalignment in generalized frequency division multiple access is described.
Because of the varying levels of expertise of our readers, vascular access is described in exquisite detail, as it is aimed at an audience of individuals who want to learn the fine points about how to prolong the function of shunts.
Timeliness, equity and access are described as part of the intervention in each included study [ 66– 77].
The various terms of access are described, including tariffs and duties, and the non-tariff barriers which can be quite effective in reducing the normal terms of trade.
Twenty four hour access is described as the 'gold standard' for PC service delivery, yet little data is available to justify the cost of this initiative to health care planners [ 15].
