The phrase "access of competitors" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to the ability of competitors to access certain resources or information, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear.
Example: "The company is concerned about the access of competitors to its proprietary technology."
Alternatives: "competitors' access" or "access for competitors".
While Facebook has sought to reduce data access of some competitors, in some cases the social network has given "special" access to tech platforms it "whitelisted", the documents show.
Second, the officials said, the study shows that in some crowded markets, including New York, Washington and Chicago, a serious shortage of airport capacity has limited the access of new competitors to the marketplace.
The access of inferior competitors increased with the number of feeding stations available within lynx territories.
Critics claim this could create a conflict of interest as it may encourage firms to block access to competitors' sites.
Each week, Rich Eisen (NFL Total Access) hosts as teams of competitors try to find their way out of seemingly impossible situations for a chance to take home a cash prize.
A report in February 2001 on slotting allowances (a practice the agency has been crusading against for years) detailed four potential antitrust problems with category captains: access to competitive information, exclusion of competitors' products, collusion among retailers that share a category captain and collusion among manufacturers.
A February 2001 report on slotting allowances (a practice the agency has been crusading against for years) detailed four potential antitrust problems with category captains: access to competitive information, exclusion of competitors' products, collusion among retailers that share a category captain and collusion among manufacturers.
Equally challenging is the question of the right of competitors to have access to their test results.
Companies were eager to get access to a vast and underserved market ahead of competitors, or to unload excess supplies where they would not depress prices at home.
It is especially true in the case of forced access, a mandate for railroads to use their private infrastructure and equipment for the benefit of competitors.
