The phrase "access control rules" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in contexts related to information security, IT, or systems management, where it refers to the policies that determine who can access certain resources.
Example: "The system administrator must ensure that the access control rules are properly configured to protect sensitive data."
Alternatives: "access permissions" or "access policies".
There are many situations where access control rules are user specific, dynamic, and then difficult to predict.
This chapter proposes an efficient client-based evaluator of access control rules for regulating access to XML documents.
The access control rules being more complex, the encrypted content and the licenses are managed through different channels, allowing different privileges to be exercised by different users on the same encrypted content.
Finally, two key innovations of our work consist in the ability to define access control rules at any level of abstraction and in enabling a verification procedure, which results in inherently privacy-aware workflows, thus fostering the realisation of the Privacy by Design vision.
Access control rules are often externalized from the application they constrain and expressed in modular, declarative access control policies for reasons of separation of concerns and modifiability.
Whilst we have built GUIs that allow users to set their access control rules, based on the attributes of the requestor, this does not provide an interface for setting more sophisticated features such as retention periods, purpose of use, or conditions such as time constraints.
Based on a set of access-control rules encoded as relational table rows, the mechanism determines via a single SQL query whether a user who accesses patient data from a specific application is authorized to perform a requested operation on a specified data object.
Expression (policy/model) properties Authorization system needs to support existing access control standards or rule specification language.
Permission rules are used to specify access control policies, while obligation rules are useful to specify other security requirements corresponding to usage control policies as the availability of information in its allotted time.
It also allows efficient representation of access control list (ACL) type rules as compared to CAM devices, leading to smaller rule memory size, which in turn leads to lower power consumption.
Access control policies (ACPs) express rules concerning who can access what information, and under what conditions.
