The phrase "accepting the validity of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the acknowledgment or recognition of the truth or legitimacy of something, such as an argument, claim, or belief.
Example: "In order to move forward, we must start by accepting the validity of the research findings presented."
Alternatives: "acknowledging the legitimacy of" or "recognizing the truth of".
As previously noted by Salo et al [ 10], accepting the validity of any scoring system for quantifying joint damage requires the acceptance of the assumption that the severity of OA/joint damage can be determined histologically.
He attacked gays for supposedly plotting to brainwash children into accepting the validity of homosexuality.
But their leader refused: accepting this election would mean accepting the validity of the NLD's stolen victory in 1990.
And, like it or not, the Politkovskaya family, in accepting the validity of the phone calls, found itself on the falsifiers' side.
Newsnight bought it, in a Monday night report that opened with Paxman accepting the validity of all the CSJ's claims before asking: "Does it matter anyway?" But whoa there, Paxo!
One must have a logical or rational justification for accepting the validity of a concept.
This is of course only valid if one accepts the validity of the genera Polygonia and Nymphalis, which some consider to be a single genus Nymphalis, along with our Aglais [e.g., [ 40, 41]].
Students whose high school biology course included evolution (but not creationism) were significantly more likely (72% versus 58%) to accept the validity of evolutionary theory ("evolution is a scientifically valid theory"), science-based claims about the age of the earth, the mutability of species (75% versus 60%), and humans being the product of evolution (71% versus 55%).
Joseph Picchi, a D.M.V. spokesman, declined to confirm or deny that the state accepted the validity of tickets issued by Old Field or Patchogue as valid.
Yet for no reading of "if" which is stronger than the truth-functional reading is CP valid — at least this is so if we treat "&" and "~" in the classical way and accept the validity of the inference: (I) ~(A&~B); A; therefore B. Suppose CP is valid for some interpretation of "If A, B".
** *** ** Q: So the answer accepts the validity of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution?
