Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "accepting definition" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey the idea of agreeing to a specific definition, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure.
Example: "In our discussion, we need to focus on accepting definition of terms to ensure everyone is on the same page."
Alternatives: "agreeing on a definition" or "endorsing a definition".
Exact(1)
"We would argue with the floodplain definition accepted by PAC … that it erred in accepting definition without strong grounds.
Similar(59)
But is this universally accepted definition correct?
There is no generally accepted definition of a recession.
Furthermore, there is no commonly accepted definition of BDP.
Hate speech has no universally accepted definition, legal experts say.
There is no universally accepted definition as such.
Curiously, there is no single, universally accepted definition of Artificial Intelligence.
In truth, there is no universally accepted definition of intelligence, either animal or human.
In truth, there is no universally accepted definition of the term.
There is no suitable and commonly accepted definition of scalability metric for heterogeneous systems.
To date there is not a fully accepted definition for iRVO.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com