Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Its report (June 7 , 1929, accepted with minor changes, went into effect on Sept. 1, 1930.
Their proposal was presented in November 1959 and accepted with few changes by the computer makers they worked for and the Pentagon.
Panel discussion resulted in retention of 39 of the originally proposed 48 criteria, with 25 being reworded, and 14 accepted with no change.
Of the 17 criteria for which there was disagreement, discussion at round two resulted in eight criteria being amended and retained, seven criteria being deleted and two criteria accepted with no change.
Of the 31 criteria for which there was agreement, discussion at round two resulted in 17 criteria being amended and retained, 2 criteria being deleted and 12 criteria accepted with no change.
2) The paper is very clearly written and can be accepted with very minor changes.
The new fields which had been added to the PROM to gather data on arrhythmia medication and concomitant illnesses were generally well accepted, with only slight changes required to the wording to reiterate that only arrhythmia related drugs were to be listed and to clarify that the illnesses listed could be caused by their arrhythmia, but were for background purposes only.
In both cases, a change is accepted with probability p = 1/(1 + exp(4Δ E)), where Δ E is the change in energy associated with adding or removing the synapse.
If the resulting change in log likelihood, Δ log ℒ, was positive, this change was accepted, while if Δ log ℒ was negative the change was accepted with probability e β Δ log ℒ for an annealing parameter β.
If the sampled inversion is indeed a sorting inversion (decided by Bader's algorithm in linear time), the change is accepted with the probability in equation (8).
In the case that the cost function is increased by ΔF > 0, the change is accepted with a probability proportional to, where T is a temperature-like parameter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com