The phrase "accepted the value of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the acknowledgment or recognition of a particular worth or significance, often in a context of agreement or understanding.
Example: "After much deliberation, the committee accepted the value of the proposed changes to the policy."
Alternatives: "acknowledged the worth of" or "recognized the importance of".
The primary difference was whether leaders accepted the value of negative thinking or not.
Most MPs have now accepted the value of gay relationships, but that might change.
If this recommendation were accepted, the value of the minimum wage would be higher than when we came to office in 2010 and we are now making good progress towards restoring the value it lost during the financial crisis.
Legend obscures the man, but it is known that he was an outspoken opponent of Buddhism until, after a heated debate with a noted Buddhist scholar on the relative merits of Hinduism and Buddhism, he accepted the value of Buddhism and became a disciple of his erstwhile opponent.
However, the public health, Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, and injury epidemiological literature more broadly, has accepted the value of a socioecological paradigm for better understanding disease and injury processes, and sports injury research will fall further behind unless it does the same.
While the value of BCG vaccination in early childhood to prevent disseminated disease is widely accepted the value of BCG vaccination in adult population particularly for pulmonary disease has been challenged in high burden countries [60].
Instead of stuffing the state with political appointees, the PT should accept the value of a career civil service.
So why did a vast list of Western political, military and academic leaders accept the value of Mao's brand at his own estimation?
(Jenkins) "Quantum Mechanics clearly has no practical applications as Philosophers cannot determine its metaphysical interpretation" (Mark Tibbetts, tweet) "This astronomical gardeeloo is an attempt to con the public into accepting the "value" of scientific research".
Maybe because they are highly intelligent and at the top of their profession, some Times staff members are more inclined to mount an elaborate argument than to accept the value of someone else's point of view.
