The phrase "accepted intelligence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you refer to information or knowledge that is widely recognized or acknowledged as valid or true.
Example: "The theory of evolution is considered an accepted intelligence in the field of biology."
Alternatives: "recognized knowledge" or "acknowledged understanding."
The former Prime Minister said that he was sorry that he accepted intelligence reports that the Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, still held weapons of mass destruction, which he had once used against his own people.
But he was sacked in 2003, leaving him free to take on the Government, especially over the invasion of Iraq, even though he had accepted intelligence reports about Saddam's chemical weapons and had voted in favour of military action.
The report claimed that, although Trump had not signed any real-estate-development deals, he and his top associates had repeatedly accepted intelligence from the Kremlin on Hillary Clinton and other political rivals.
Robert Oakley, a former Ambassador to Pakistan, told me that the Pakistanis have countenanced a few American military advisers, and accepted intelligence help from the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. Pakistan also allows the United States to conduct overflights and provide logistical help.
We measured intelligence by using a surrogate for the widely accepted intelligence quotient (IQ).
Perhaps he would accept "intelligence" instead.
On Wednesday, in his testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Pompeo insisted that Trump fully accepts intelligence reports of Russian interference in 2016.
Most importantly, they lamented how the incoming president refused to accept intelligence agencies' conclusion that Russia was responsible for a hacking and influence operation that upended the election that brought him to office.
The Texas bill is the first anti-science legislation introduced in the state legislature since 2012, when a House bill promised to protect university students and professors who accept "intelligence design," or creationist theory.
These debates accept intelligence services as an integral and "normal" part of the democratic state mechanisms, performing various assigned functions for the defense and protection of democracy, regulated by legislation, financed by public funds and providing a service for the community at large like any other governmental department.
Others will say the rules are not tight enough and accepting intelligence from those who might torture will encourage them to continue.
