The phrase "accepted in the first" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to refer to something that was accepted initially or at the beginning of a process, but it needs more context to be usable.
Example: "The proposal was accepted in the first round of evaluations, which surprised everyone."
Alternatives: "accepted initially" or "accepted at first".
Focusing purely on the consequences of acceptance of rules ignores the "transition" costs of getting those rules accepted in the first place.
If the proposal is accepted in the first stage, then a fine-scale simulation is performed at the second stage to determine the acceptance probability.
No one at the company would discuss on the record the exact details about how the project had been accepted in the first place.
Persons will be admitted from the Waitlist to fill positions that become available when some of the persons accepted in the first round decide to drop the course.
Furthermore, among people considering an M.B.A., the average incoming Harvard Business School student needs the degree the least, given the qualifications required to be accepted in the first place.
In this particular case, a study that found no correlation between CEO performance and likelihood of getting sacked, for example, might be less likely to have been accepted in the first place, and therefore wouldn't be available to the professors.
He was denied permission to train with the first unit but was accepted in the second unit, the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group at Dannelly Air National Guard Base in Montgomery.
As Darwin's theory of evolution became accepted in the nineteenth century, writers began to imagine what life might be like if shaped by environments different from Earth.
The principle that a necessarily false proposition implies any proposition, and that a necessarily true proposition is implied by any proposition, was apparently first propounded in twelfth century Latin logic, and came to be widely, though not universally, accepted in the fourteenth century.
Following negotiations with the SFA and SPL, the SFL clubs had been offered play-offs to the SPL and a working party into an expansion of the top flight in return for Rangers being accepted in the second tier.
The earliest editions of De Vita Caesarum published in Rome in 1470 and Venice in 1471 used "Avete vos", but this version was still accepted in the nineteenth century, as can be seen in the Baumgarten-Crusius edition of 1816.
