The phrase "accepted in error" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something was mistakenly acknowledged or approved.
Example: "The payment was accepted in error, and we will need to reverse the transaction."
Alternatives: "acknowledged by mistake" or "approved in mistake."
At the time, Ms. Brady said, the bid was accepted in error; it was later annulled.
According to the Associated Press, BofA accepted Ficco into its mortgage-mod program and cashed the checks she sent -- until the day it informed her that she wasn't actually eligible for the program, that she'd been invited and accepted in error and that the bank now wanted to foreclose on her house.
Only peptides with a probability >0.80 were accepted; in this case, the error rate was lower than 4%.
For this reason, an error less than a certain threshold was accepted in accordance with the literature [ 57].
Here, the global optimum was considered to be found if R < 1, where R is the ratio of the current error to the accepted error, ie, In the experiments we used γ = 2 · 10−4, a choice which is motivated by that the function value at the second smallest local minimum in some cases differ to the global minimum by almost as little as this.
They then accept, in some measure, that its errors are their errors, its aberrations their aberrations, and that any revolt will be against them.
They then accept, in some measure, that its errors are their errors, its aberrations their aberrations, and that any revolt will be against them". The recent overthrow of Egypt's elected government is in many ways a revolt by Egyptians against themselves.
Since the maximal accepted measurement error is ±10%, misclassification in one class up or down is acceptable; a measure of correct forecast probability is also provided.
Open image in new window Fig. 13 Cluster of wind plants: actual power, predicted power, and accepted predicted error range Open image in new window Fig. 14 Eight wind plants: actual power, predicted power and accepted predicted error range.
The results obtained in all studies showed very good reproducibility with standard deviations within the accepted analytical error of ±0.5 ‰.
Authors' response: The data describing the presence of the modification in E. coli EF-P in Aoki H et al publication (Febs J 1998, 275:671-681) is quite crude based only on predicted mass of tryptic peptide, so we feel we are in the accepted error margins.
