The phrase "accepted for validation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something has been approved or acknowledged for the purpose of verification or assessment.
Example: "The application has been accepted for validation by the review committee."
Alternatives: "approved for verification" or "acknowledged for assessment".
The reference dataset was used as the hypothesis generating dataset, and all pathways with a FDR adjusted p-value < 0.1 were accepted for validation in the independent validation dataset.
Several previous studies from both microarray and high-throughput sequencing data have shown that 95% of the primer sets surrounding random selected regions of the genome displayed ΔCp values of less than two, and a threshold of ΔCp > 2 has been generally accepted for validation of DHSs, as ΔCp > 2 in principle reflect a four-fold reduction in DNA concentration [ 3, 4].
Currently, only in situ challenge testing is accepted for treatment validation, yet this is impractical for stormwater biofilters because of their size and operational conditions; e.g. stormwater harvesting biofilters are often large systems that receive significant volumes of urban stormwater during short periods of time.
An accepted method for validation is to derive a prognostic/predictive gene set from a "training set" and then apply it to a completely independent "test set" [ 17].
This clearly indicates that the EC validation can be accepted for identification of the groundwater recharging sites.
The groundwater recharging map of the study area was validated with measured electrical conductivity (EC) values in the groundwater, and it indicated that validation can be accepted for the identification of groundwater recharging sites.
But the articles describing the research have not yet been accepted for publication, an important step in the validation of scientific claims.
Large-scale automated validation of chemical structure datasets, accepted for publication to Journal of Cheminformatics).
Generalized cross-validation or jackknife methods are broadly accepted for tuning smoothing parameters.
The importance of tests in this context is obvious, since a service request is only accepted for billing if it does not show any failures during validation.
Although the pressure flow theory is widely accepted for the transport of photoassimilates in phloem sieve elements, it still requires strong experimental validation.
