Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The plaintiff accepted (correctly in my view) that he had to establish that Google Inc intended to publish the material complained of.
Similar(11)
Our rates decrease naturally when the size of the database increases to accept correctly in 92 % with a dataset of 40 and reject wrongly in 15 %.
We succeeded to accept correctly in 87%% of cases when we used the whole database (100 writers) and up to 92 % when we used 40 writers.
While in this experiment the correct transcription of the response was always in the language model, our system must also be able to reject utterances when they are not present in the language model, while still accepting correctly recognized utterances.
The obtained results are very promising since we succeed to accept correctly in 87%% of cases when we used the whole database (100 writers) and up to 92 % when we used 40 writers.
The final SMILES, even after manual editing, adhere to the OpenSMILES specification and are mostly accepted and correctly interpreted by different cheminformatics software such as indigo-depict, Open Babel or CDK.
Thus, the quantitative criterion rejected three image pairs that were originally accepted as correctly aligned by visual evaluation.
The large part of the AC-IE editorial decisions (70%) could be classified as either correctly accepted (later highly cited) or correctly rejected (later low citation counts).
With incorrect authorization, the commands cannot be executed by the TPM chip nor the output be correctly accepted.
As predicted by the derivations, all three metrics (K i, MRgluc, and M R gluc max ) correctly accepted the null hypothesis at baseline in the 42 comparisons of the control with treatment groups in the full experimental data (Table 2).
Taylor and Russell [13] provided eleven tables from which, based on the given base rate, selection rate, and validity coefficient, the percentage of correctly accepted submissions (AQ/(AQ+AN)) can be taken.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com