Sentence examples for accepted categorization from inspiring English sources

Articles were graded using a commonly accepted categorization scheme (the SORT approach), which is recommended for grading the quality of evidence published in the medical literature [ 3].

Good neurologic recovery was defined as CPC 1 and 2. CPC scores were further dichotomized into good outcomes (CPC 1 or 2) and poor outcomes (CPC 3, 4, or 5), which is an accepted categorization when evaluating patients with PCAS.

One of the limitations of this study is that there is no definitive classification for high- and non-high-income countries and, while we used a widely accepted categorization scheme, some of the countries may have been classified differently using other approaches.

The remaining physiologic variables not included in APACHE III neurologic function, scoma, and blood gasses, pafi were discretized using clinically accepted categorizations [ 49, 50].

Until now, the more accepted classification system, namely that of the AFS, is associated with serious limitations in effective categorization of female genital anomalies.

In Springfield, however, cashew chicken accepts no categorization.

By contrast, the African National Congress Youth League, a division of the African National Congress, issued a statement saying that it "will never accept the categorization of Caster Semenya as a hermaphrodite, because in South Africa and the entire world of sanity, such does not exist".

[2017-03] Paper on fine-grained categorization accepted by CVPR 2017! [2017-01] I will intern at Google Research this summer.

This categorization of accepted ranges for diagnosis of glucose tolerance was chosen to help characterize the glycemic level at which β-cell dysfunction presents.

Further, so that comparisons can be made between the Centre's work, its relationship to national policies and programmes and relevance to global trends, the Centre should consider adopting a more globally accepted model of research categorization such as those described in Donald Stoke's Pasteur's Quadrant [ 11] or Buxton and Hanney's Payback Framework [ 12].

Such application design (1) incurs cost in paying an expert or a group of users to label what they call spam from what they consider real email; (2) may result in inconsistencies if we accept all human categorization.