The phrase "accepted as justification" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether a certain reason or explanation is deemed valid or sufficient to support a claim or action.
Example: "The committee found that the evidence presented was not accepted as justification for the proposed changes."
Alternatives: "recognized as valid" or "considered sufficient".
In general, weak evidentiary support has been accepted as adequate justification for these guidelines.
"Regime change" was not the policy of the British government, it has been specifically condemned by the highest English legal authorities as an insufficient basis for invasion, and it would not have been accepted as a justification for war by even the most supine Labour MPs.
As explanations can never be universal (in the social sciences), they need to adequately meet four conditions to be accepted as a justification: The first condition indicates logical reasoning to explain something (the object of explanations is called explanandum).
"She was a b----," is accepted as reasonable justification for inflicting sexual harm.
In order for the practice of discontinuing a constitutive treatment of VS or CS to be permitted legally and ethically, moral fictions about life-terminating decisions (in terms of intention, causation, and responsibility) must be accepted as valid justifications.
Probability and possibility are critical to understand what can be accepted as an analytical proof, a justification, a probation, a critique, or a falsification [12].
"These absurd characterisations, unquestioningly accepted as true, then serve as the justification for more extreme forms of harassment," Sarkeesian says.
We have provided evidence that in most Sub-Saharan African countries studied here IPVAW is widely accepted as a response to women's transgressing gender norms, men find less justification for the practice than do women.
In most Sub-Saharan African countries studied where IPVAW is widely accepted as a response to women's transgressing gender norms, men find less justification for the practice than do women.
The possible justification put forward is that cotton seed has fast decomposition rate, and hence, is accepted as a superior substrate over other lignocellulosic wastes, such as sawdust (Quinio et al. 1990).
