The phrase "accepted a proposed" is not correct as it is incomplete.
It should be "accepted a proposed plan" or "accepted a proposed idea" to be grammatically correct and usable in written English. You can use it when discussing the acceptance of a suggestion or plan that has been put forward for consideration.
Example: "The committee accepted a proposed budget for the upcoming year after thorough discussion."
Alternatives: "approved a suggested" or "endorsed a proposed".
Ultimately, they said, the agency's chairman, Robert Pitofsky, decided to accept a proposed settlement because of additional concessions that the companies had made in the last month.
The battle over the future of VNU heated up Monday as the Dutch media company's management urged investors to accept a proposed 7.5 billion euro buyout and reject a rival plan put forth by a dissident shareholder.
On a folded copy of the day's newspaper, he kept score of those opposed to any increase in the budget and those willing to accept a proposed 2.7percentt increase.
The second circuit wrote, correctly, "For the courts to simply accept a proposed SEC consent decree without any review would be a dereliction of the court's duty to ensure the orders it enters are proper".
Department officials refused to accept a proposed finding in an environmental assessment for the United States Border Patrol that putting towers with radar, cameras and communications equipment on Interior Department lands would have no significant impact, said a spokesman for Customs and Border Protection.
Heathrow is to press the government to loosen the conditions attached to a third runway going ahead, with the airport reluctant to accept a proposed ban on night flights or legislation against further expansion.
Ending a yearlong investigation, the Justice Department on Monday announced its conditions for accepting a proposed merger between Ticketmaster Entertainment and Live Nation, a deal that could significantly remake the live entertainment business by combining touring, management and ticketing into one company.
The measure expressed "grave concern" over the crisis in Darfur, in western Sudan, but to achieve the unanimous backing of the 15-member Council the United States had to drop language putting pressure on Sudan to accept a proposed United Nations-African Union peacekeeping force there.
Judge Randa also cited an earlier Rakoff opinion, in a 2009 S.E.C. case against Bank of America, in which the judge declined to accept a proposed settlement and made the parties draw up another agreement, which called for a bigger fine against the bank.
In February, a US judge refused to accept a proposed settlement between the NFL and the players, saying payment should be expanded for some players and families among other concerns.
