The phrase "acceptance of science" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the acknowledgment or endorsement of scientific principles, theories, or findings.
Example: "The acceptance of science is crucial for informed decision-making in public health policies."
Alternatives: "embrace of science" or "recognition of science".
The battle for the acceptance of science journalists and communicators as key players in the development field, and for free access to scientific information, is far from over.
We are making progress in the understanding, application and acceptance of science and risk based approaches, including lean stability.
The importance of acceptance of science and technology by the public, alongside a need for scientists to become more accountable to the public, was also discussed.
In conjunction with Masci (2009), our results suggest that some factors leading to higher acceptance of science could be familiarity with one's religion (as long at the religion is neutral or supportive to evolution), intellectual engagement and/or theological engagement.
Next to 'hard' issues in governance of science and technology such as risk assessment, soft issues such as naturalness, playing God, techno-scepticism and environmentalism also play an important role in the public's acceptance of science and technology (Swierstra & te Molder 2012).
The acceptance of science has come a long way since Galileo was arrested as a heretic for questioning the order of the Universe.
Personally I have never been surprised by the reluctance of a society whose existence relies on the ignorance and complacency of its citizens to widely accept the critical habits of mind necessary for understanding and acceptance of evolutionary science.
This acceptance of climate science and uncertainty related to it was mirrored in the public which hardly challenged climate science (Jasanoff 2011).
