The phrase "acceptance of mobility" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the willingness or readiness to embrace change, movement, or flexibility, particularly in relation to travel, work, or lifestyle.
Example: "The acceptance of mobility is crucial for adapting to the evolving job market in today's global economy."
Alternatives: "embracing mobility" or "willingness to move".
Further targeted education around appropriate patient selection and the role of mobility in patients with stable shock may enhance clinician acceptance of mobility in this subgroup of patients.
Finding the time and personnel necessary to mobilize can be a deterrent to implementation of mobility programs and an often reported concern in quality improvement studies targeting broader acceptance of mobility [ 12, 13, 19, 22, 25].
Another contribution of this study is to validate perceived mobility as an effective antecedent variable while modelling physicians' acceptance of mobile technology.
Understanding of acceptance of electric mobility has been typically discussed by a comparison of vehicles with different types of propulsion engines, battery electric vehicles and vehicles with an internal combustion engine.
Thus, integration of charging into daily routines is the key to acceptance of electric mobility.
This equal assessment was highly negatively correlated with the acceptance of electric mobility in general.
The current increase in life expectancy, together with decreasing societal acceptance of impaired mobility, have strongly pushed musculoskeletal research in recent years.
Two recent studies regarding users' acceptance of mobile services have provided preliminary evidence, which have confirmed the existence of the relationship between perceived mobility and perceived ease of use [ 49, 50].
In order to support the acceptance of new forms of mobility, it is critical to raise awareness of the traffic behaviours of all individuals.
The new technologies indeed create opportunities to increase spatial mobility, but social acceptance of different forms of mobility seems to be also important.
Fortunately, since the mid-1990s, as Turner (2011) shows in his recent review, these views have been challenged by a 'new pastoral development paradigm' that 'incorporates a widespread acceptance of the importance of livestock mobility within the context of devolving greater rangeland management authority to local groups'.
