The phrase "acceptable threat" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing risks or dangers that are considered tolerable or manageable within a certain framework, such as security or negotiation.
Example: "In the context of cybersecurity, an acceptable threat might be a low-level attack that can be easily mitigated without significant impact on the system."
Alternatives: "tolerable risk" or "manageable threat".
Specifically, the department should "urgently review the proper balance between acceptable risks and expected outcomes in high risk, high threat areas". The "acceptable" threat tolerance may become close to zero.
Meanwhile, somewhere in a Thames Valley industrial estate, a cold-hearted risk analyst with a little model plane on his desk has calculated that the one-in-a-million "hull loss" (the industry's dispassionate terminology for what most of us know as "a fucking awful plane crash") is an acceptable threat to the balance sheet.
Meanwhile, somewhere in a bland cubicle, a cold-hearted risk analyst with a little model plane on his desk has calculated that the one-in-a-million "hull loss" (the industry's dispassionate terminology for what most of us know as "a fucking awful plane crash") is an acceptable threat to the balance sheet.
Cheap and easy-to-implement measures that are likely to reduce the risk of even an acceptable threat should be implemented as a matter of course.
A majority of the 24 drivers said that while they had requested stricter rules to define what is acceptable, the threat of a penalty for causing an accident does not change their way of driving.
That was acceptable when threats at sea and the threats to the nation were less and the United States was a hyperpower and there was nobody to challenge us at sea or challenge our maritime interests.
READING "Banksy: You Are an Acceptable Level of Threat and if You Were Not You Would Know About It," published by Carpet Bombing Culture.
The loquaciously named Banksy: You Are an Acceptable Level of Threat and if You Were Not You Would Know About It is published in June but in the meantime, you can read the one his friend's just published, or the one a former journalist's bringing out next month.
"The continuation of the dangerous situation in Rabaa al-Adawiya and Nahda squares, and consequent terrorism and road blockages are no longer acceptable given the threat to national security," Information Minister Dorreya Sharaf el-Din said in the televised statement.
"The continuation of the dangerous situation in Rabaa al-Adawiya and Nahda squares, and consequent terrorism and road blockages, are no longer acceptable given the threat to national security," it said in a statement on Wednesday.
It's important to note that the EPA does already regulate fine particulate matter, but recent studies are finding that the levels currently deemed "acceptable" remain a threat to health on various levels.
