The phrase "acceptable purposes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to reasons or intentions that are deemed appropriate or permissible in a given context.
Example: "The data collected will only be used for acceptable purposes, such as research and analysis."
Alternatives: "permissible uses" or "appropriate reasons".
Phase-out can take several years because time is provided for users to find substitutes and, in some cases, such as DDT, specific exemptions for continued availability may be granted for acceptable purposes such as for the protection of human health.
Acceptable purposes include quoting material for criticism or commentary, parody, or news reporting.
With a proper guide and acceptable purpose, these spirits can be blocked from ever taking hold.
In addition to the "positive list" format of the current regulation in Japan, which lists acceptable research purposes, it is appropriate to consider the additional use of a "negative list" format that lists unacceptable research purposes, or a shift to the negative list format completely.
Presumably, in its proposed regulations, the SEC will indicate what criteria in addition to total shareholder return are acceptable for purposes of "measuring" executive compensation against corporate performance.
(f) The Administrator may approve, on a case-by-case basis, a regulated entity's use of an alternative method in lieu of Method 24 for determining the VOC content of coatings if the alternative method is demonstrated to the Administrator's satisfaction to provide results that are acceptable for purposes of determining compliance with this subpart.
This policy provides for controlled release of genomic data to legitimate external researchers for acceptable research purposes.
An alpha coefficient of 0.70 or higher was considered acceptable for purposes of group comparisons [ 21]. "Known groups" or clinical validity was evaluated by comparing the QLQ-BN20 scores between patients grouped according to KPS and MMSE scores.
Assessment of available carbohydrate by difference (total carbohydrate by difference minus dietary fibre by Prosky or comparable method) is considered acceptable for purposes of energy evaluation of conventional foods.
The error of 10% in the pressure drop prediction by CFD is acceptable for design purposes.
The experimental design of the DoD/ESTCP study directed the investigators to consider the existing flow and transport models as "up-to-date and acceptable for design purposes".
