The phrase "acceptable payer" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to finance, insurance, or healthcare to refer to a person or entity that meets the criteria for making payments or covering costs.
Example: "Before proceeding with the treatment, we need to verify that you are an acceptable payer under our insurance policy."
Alternatives: "qualified payer" or "approved payer".
Ultimately, the results show that the incremental QALYs come at an acceptable incremental cost when employing the commonly accepted payer willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per additional QALY gained employed in the UK by NICE, indicating the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4i as an add-on to metformin for the treatment of T2DM.
Using the net-benefit approach, we found selective excavation to have the highest probability of being acceptable for a payer in terms of cost-effectiveness regardless of the payer's willingness-to-pay threshold.
In general, a non-tiered evaluation in which a large battery of tests is ordered as part of the initial testing scheme is poorly tolerated by the patient and family and less acceptable to third-party payers.
Even though a treatment shows a positive clinical profile it is important to ensure that the potential gains in terms of improved health for the patient come at an acceptable cost to the payers of health care.
The innovative nature, the high unmet medical need and the expected unprecedented efficacy of next generation AVDs will highly likely lead to the case that even relatively high incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, that have been obtained when simulating various effect and pricing scenarios, will be regarded as acceptable from a German healthcare payer perspective.
In conclusion, the present study suggests that gargling has potential as a cost-effective preventive strategy for URTI that is acceptable from both third-party payer and societal perspectives.
In some cases, in order to defray the costs to the licence payer, it may be acceptable to supplement the cost of mounting a BBC off-air event or activity by sponsorship from a non-commercial or commercial organisation.
In some cases, in order to defray the costs to the licence payer, it may be acceptable to supplement the cost of mounting a public event by sponsorship from a non- commercial body.
This study suggests gargling as a cost-effective preventive strategy for URTI that is acceptable from perspectives of both the third-party payer and society.
These professions will be made superfluous in a single payer mandated system which all other developed countries find acceptable and seem to work better for the benefit of their populations.
