acceptable level for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "acceptable level for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing standards, thresholds, or criteria that are deemed satisfactory in a particular context. Example: "The acceptable level for noise pollution in this area is set at 55 decibels."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

Medication adherence was set at ≥80% as the minimum acceptable level for each prescribed medication, a commonly accepted cut-off point for defining a therapeutic level of medication adherence [ 33].

BMC Family Practice

fulgens♂ was at an acceptable level for commercial production.

Aquaculture

"Just what is an acceptable level for public health is a matter of public policy".

The New York Times

But the report suggests any figure between £25,000 and £50,000 would be an acceptable level for the cap.

The Guardian

So the president's reassurances have been enough to keep criticism at an acceptable level for the White House.

The New York Times

Huge mass is required to shield these electrons to reduce the radiation doses to the acceptable level for spacecraft electronics.

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

Inorganic nitrogen concentrations were within acceptable levels for tilapia culture.

Aquacultural Engineering

Acceptable levels for tritium in drinking water are very low and inconsistent with levels set for other potentially toxic materials.

The New York Times

"In general, cost is increasing but that is, I believe, within acceptable levels for stakeholders and the public".

The Guardian

The safety commission is working to set acceptable levels for other products.

The New York Times

She also said that there were no federal standards dictating acceptable levels for lead in rubber pellets, so the city used the federal standard for bare soil.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When defining an "acceptable level for" something, clearly state the units of measurement to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of "an acceptable level for radiation", specify "an acceptable level for radiation exposure of 1 millisievert per year".

Common error

Avoid using "acceptable level for" without providing specific context or measurable criteria. For example, saying "the acceptable level for errors" is vague. Instead, specify "the acceptable level for data entry errors is 1% per month".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "acceptable level for" functions primarily as a modifier followed by a prepositional phrase. It defines a standard or threshold that is considered satisfactory in a particular context. As Ludwig AI examples show, it's often used in scientific, news, and business contexts to set criteria.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

47%

News & Media

37%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "acceptable level for" is a versatile phrase used to define a satisfactory standard or threshold across various domains. According to Ludwig AI, it's considered grammatically correct and sees frequent usage in scientific, news, and formal contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure to provide specific and measurable criteria to prevent vagueness. Alternatives such as "permissible limit for" or "admissible standard for" can be used to convey similar meanings. Remember that while the phrase is widely accepted, clarity in defining what constitutes an "acceptable level" is crucial for effective communication. The prevalence of this phrase in authoritative sources like The New York Times and scientific journals underscores its importance in both formal and informal discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

permissible threshold for

Replaces "level" with "threshold" and "acceptable" with "permissible", emphasizing the allowed limit.

admissible standard for

Substitutes "acceptable" with "admissible" and "level" with "standard", suggesting a criterion that is allowed or can be admitted.

satisfactory degree of

Uses "satisfactory degree of" instead of "acceptable level for", focusing on the degree to which something meets requirements.

tolerable extent of

Replaces "acceptable level" with "tolerable extent", highlighting the extent to which something can be endured or tolerated.

allowable limit for

Emphasizes the limit that is permitted or allowable, replacing "acceptable level".

appropriate measure for

Focuses on the suitability or appropriateness of a measure, differing slightly from acceptability.

suitable standard for

Highlights the suitability of a standard, rather than the acceptability of a level.

reasonable threshold for

Indicates a threshold that is considered fair and rational, rather than just acceptable.

adequate criterion for

Focuses on whether a criterion is sufficient or adequate, which is a related but distinct concept from acceptability.

passable grade for

Implies a minimum level of quality required to pass, which is a specific type of acceptability.

FAQs

How is "acceptable level for" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "acceptable level for" is used to describe a threshold or standard that is considered satisfactory or permissible in a given situation. For instance, "The "acceptable level for noise" in residential areas is usually lower than in industrial zones".

What are some alternatives to "acceptable level for"?

Alternatives include "permissible limit for", "admissible standard for", or "satisfactory degree of depending" on the context.

How do you determine an "acceptable level for" something?

Determining an "acceptable level for" something often involves considering factors such as safety, cost, feasibility, and regulatory requirements. It typically requires a careful assessment of risks and benefits to establish a reasonable threshold.

What happens when something exceeds the "acceptable level for"?

When something exceeds the "acceptable level for", corrective actions are usually necessary to mitigate the potential risks or negative consequences. This might involve implementing new controls, improving existing processes, or even suspending operations until the situation is brought back into compliance.