The phrase "acceptable justification for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing reasons or explanations that are deemed satisfactory or appropriate for a particular situation or action.
Example: "The committee found that there was an acceptable justification for the delay in project completion."
Alternatives: "valid reason for" or "reasonable explanation for".
It held that Zionist ideology is not an acceptable justification for seizing occupied lands.
Attacking Israelis is self-defense, which, according to the Koran, is the only acceptable justification for fighting.
They said that although during a political campaign some might support limits on the speech of those considered "too powerful," this was not an acceptable "justification for withholding First Amendment rights from any group—labor or corporate".
They said that although during a political campaign some might support limits on the speech of those considered "too powerful," this was not an acceptable "justification for withholding First Amendment rights from any group — labor or corporate".
It is an irony that while in his philosophy Khayyam offers a rational explanation for the existence of evil, in his Rubā'iyyāt he strongly condemns the presence of evil and finds no acceptable justification for its presence.
However, his professional background as a neurosurgeon may be considered an acceptable justification for his dietary choices.
However, when assessing further the possible acceptable justifications for CO, approximately one third would accept CO based on a simple statement.
First, most HCW respondents expect that AR is done with high methodological quality, and that costs and difficulty are not acceptable justifications for lower quality.
Asked about methodological quality, most respondents expect that: AR is done to high quality; costs and difficulty are not acceptable justifications for low quality; findings should be reproducible between laboratories and strains of the same species; and guidelines for AR funded with public money should be consistent with these expectations.
The exponential Arrhenius expression was used as the basis for this correlation, but it did not provide an acceptable justification about the physics of deposition.
The establishment of the minimum acceptable levels of service also provides rational justification for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation needs.
