The phrase "acceptable indicators" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to metrics or signs that are deemed suitable or appropriate for a particular purpose or evaluation.
Example: "In our analysis, we identified several acceptable indicators of market performance that can guide our investment decisions."
Alternatives: "suitable metrics" or "valid signs".
Round 2 results indicated agreement that clinical identification or third party report were acceptable indicators of CNS abnormality at the screening stage (Table 5, statements 18-21).
Academics, business leaders and government officials must work together to develop and refine acceptable indicators.
Corrected item –total correlations above 0.2 [ 25, 52] and Cronbach's alpha between 0.7 and 0.95 [ 24] were considered acceptable indicators of internal reliability.
Both V-LUS and Q-LUS are acceptable indicators of pulmonary edema in patients mechanically ventilated with low PEEP but at high PEEP only Q-LUS provides data that are significantly correlated with.
The results showed that the dynamic modulus of elasticity loss can be regard as an acceptable indicator for evaluating the resistance of concrete to sulfuric acid attack as well as corrosion depth and mass loss.
However, Shannon indices (both diversity and evenness) (Shannon 1948) are the most commonly used and acceptable indicator of biodiversity (Kent and Coker 1992; Mouillot and Lepretre 1999) and have been used in this research to indicate the level of tree diversity.
While education alone is not a complete measure of SES, it is considered to be an acceptable indicator [31].
Alternatives to risk adjustment include defining a priori an acceptable indicator rate.
ADI-4 has a high correlation (0.83) with the HADS-T score from HUNT 2 and is an acceptable indicator for MSAD (sensitivity 0.51, specificity 0.93).
This study, based on a transparent process, helps formally define widely acceptable, quantitative indicators and provides a platform for further debate and continuing indicator development that should include the review and updating of indicators as priorities and technologies change and interventions to improve quality of care are scaled up.
Values between 0.70 and 0.95 were considered acceptable reliability indicators [ 17].
