MOS score Completely different Bad Acceptable Good Very good 1 2 3 4 5 □ □ □ □ □ B.
The criteria are evaluated by five quality ratings: poor, marginal, acceptable, good and excellent.
We employ PSNR = 32 dB, 34 dB and 36 dB to represent acceptable, good and very good quality, respectively.
The radiologist also gave an overall assessment of image quality on a 4-category scale (poor, suboptimal, acceptable, good).
Over 98% of the questions were pre-coded, and the Cronbach alpha reliability score of 0.8, which is in the acceptable good range, was derived from all the items in the questionnaire.
We regarded AUC values of >0.7, >0.8, and >0.9 as acceptable, good, or excellent, respectively [ 39].
An adequate acoustic window was defined by an acceptable, good, or excellent score.
In addition, the form included an overall performance assessment rubric with five categories: poor, unacceptable, acceptable, good, and excellent.
The reliability of this scale was evaluated with acceptable good results in intraclass correlation coefficients 0.56 0.91 [ 26, 28].
Here, a Cronbach's alpha from 0.70-0.80, 0.81-0.90 and ≥0.90 was considered as acceptable, good, and excellent, respectively [ 28].
In the different dimensions of the study the Cronbach alphas ranged from 0.655 to 0.865, acceptable, good, very good or almost perfect values according to the criteria adopted [ 25].
