The phrase "acceptable for studying" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that meets the necessary standards or criteria for academic or educational purposes.
Example: "The materials provided are acceptable for studying, ensuring that students have the resources they need to succeed."
Alternatives: "suitable for studying" or "appropriate for studying".
Within the constraints of the experimental design employed here, the HFA mice model proved to be acceptable for studying dose-related effects of tetracycline on human intestinal microflora.
This is acceptable for studying effects of interventions in groups of subjects.
Such a simplification is frequently applied in epidemic models and is assumed acceptable for studying long-term dynamics.
Though the control synthetic medium formulated in this work is not exactly comparable with the actual biomass hydrolysate due to experimental limitations, the nutrient value is close enough to be considered acceptable for studying the effect of different inhibitors on strain performance.
Using a model box for laboratory model experiments on a slope is one of the most effective and acceptable methods for studying the occurrence and development of landslides.
We therefore consider an OGTT an acceptable model for studying the impact of GH on stimulated insulin signaling and glucose uptake in skeletal muscle.
These reproducibility values are acceptable for studies where analysis of [11C](R -PK11195 binding is limited to laR -PK11195 regions, however, is insufficient for quantitative analysis in small regions.
POCKit tests were donated by the manufacturer for study use and the test was considered less invasive than venipuncture and thus more acceptable for study participants.
A response rate of 65% has been mentioned as acceptable for studies with self-completion postal questionnaires (which were used at T2 and T3).
Subjects were selected from the general population, the sample was large, the response rate to the questionnaire (more than 80%) was acceptable for study settings such as this, and the loss to follow-up (0.4%) was negligible.
The histologically confirmed RO (CRM −ve) resection rate of 83% for those resected and 68% overall is acceptable for studies in this group of borderline unresectable rectal cancers (Wheeler et al, 2004; Mawdsley et al, 2005; Sebag-Montefiore et al, 2005).
