The phrase "acceptable for intervention" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing criteria or standards that determine whether an action or involvement is appropriate or permissible.
Example: "The committee found that the situation was acceptable for intervention, given the potential risks involved."
Alternatives: "suitable for intervention" or "appropriate for intervention".
Put differently, a less favorable cost-effectiveness ratio is acceptable for an intervention in the context of a greater proportional shortfall, i.e., when the treatment is deemed to be more necessary, and unacceptable when the associated proportional shortfall is low.
During the following hours of observation it was no different from the values acceptable for cardiosurgical interventions (125 ± 17 35 ± 7 ml/hour) (Table 1).
In the light of evidence from this study it is difficult to interpret whether an adherence of 70% is acceptable for a nutritional intervention within a program setup.
It is plausible that these interventions are acceptable for those at risk because interventions are not associated with any hazard and can be provided according to the individuals' preference, i.e. in an individual format, a group intervention or a format using the internet.
These findings suggest that ACT is an effective and acceptable adjunct intervention for patients with chronic pain.
The results will also be crucial to informing acceptable entry points for interventions to mitigate pollution.
The recent cancer chemoprevention trial experiences have directed the focus on the following four pivotal issues: (1) Acceptable therapeutic index for interventions in healthy populations: Individuals who are treated for a full-blown malignancy accept toxic therapies as a price for improved quality of life, survival, or both.
In contrast, the acceptable therapeutic index for interventions intended for healthy individuals at risk of cancer in the future has '… been both underestimated and overestimated from failure to critically assess the parameter in relation to the modulation of the relevant biologic/biochemical/molecular end-points' (Meyskens and Szabo, 2005).
A recent systematic review of psychosocial interventions for HF/NS concluded that while psycho-educational interventions are acceptable for HF/NS, further evaluation of treatment effects in high-quality randomised controlled trials are required.
A prioritised list of potentially feasible and acceptable interventions for increasing immunisation uptake across the five levels of the SEM for these Traveller communities.
