The phrase "acceptable focus" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a topic or subject that is deemed appropriate or suitable for attention or consideration.
Example: "In our discussion, we need to ensure that we maintain an acceptable focus on the key issues at hand."
Alternatives: "suitable emphasis" or "appropriate concentration".
When Time magazine and other media outlets declared an attention-deficit hyperactivity epidemic in America, Gladwell argued that people were no more distracted than they'd ever been, but that Ritalin had replaced nicotine as a socially acceptable focusing stimulant.
But scientists also have "external," social responsibilities "toward the larger community," Frankel argued and "it is no longer acceptable to focus on internal responsibilities".
When questioned about what the community would want to know about a research project before it would be considered acceptable, they focused on wanting to understand the reason for the research and to know the benefits of the research for the community before making decisions about acceptability.
Not only do we have an acceptable place to focus and deliver high levels of emotional stress and response, but also receive feelings of well-being, trust and satisfaction in our social life.
From the four acceptable instruments, each focus group independently chose the PHQ-9 as the most appropriate and easiest to translate.
Three themes emerged: perceptions of harmful, unacceptable or problematic alcohol use as 'the other' normalisation of alcohol use when perceived to be controlled and harm free the ability to function as an endorsement of acceptable alcohol use Focus groups considered unacceptable or problematic use of alcohol to be associated with long-term, heavy and binge drinking.
However, the 8-feature DNN model also worked properly and the performance was acceptable and we focused more on it for the sake of a device brevity.
The work on acceptable colour change focussed on threshold methods and the concept of 'just noticeable difference' (JND).
Finally, we argue that checklists represent a rational and methodical way to develop acceptable practice standards focussed upon the difficult risk mitigation choices that are made by civil protection authorities and at-risk individuals.
Our formative research in Bengaluru suggested that promoting DV prevention as part of maternal and child health care was likely to be safer and more acceptable than one focused exclusively on DV.
