The phrase "acceptable evidence for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the validity or sufficiency of evidence in support of a claim or argument.
Example: "The study provided acceptable evidence for the effectiveness of the new treatment."
Alternatives: "valid proof for" or "satisfactory evidence for".
Acceptable evidence for watchlisting, termed "minimum substantive derogatory standards", include social media posts and even the manner of someone's walk.
The instrument has acceptable evidence for data quality, reliability, validity and responsiveness in rheumatology rehabilitation.
Thus we found acceptable evidence for our proposed model which was based on a priori hypothesis derived from SDT.
The judge rules that the patient should not have undergone NVD, without asking why she had received induction while only a short time had passed since her EDC (Estimated Date of Confinement)." On the other hand, lack of accurate technology (fetal monitoring systems), capable of providing acceptable evidence for judges, are among other problems faced in this regard.
But in proposing sanctions, the new letter from regulators said that the company's response "does not constitute a credible allegation of compliance and acceptable evidence of correction for the deficiencies cited".
There was evidence to support the one-factor and two-factor models of OKS, but no acceptable evidence of structural validity was found for KOOS-PS or ICOAP.
Increasingly comparative effectiveness research has been promoted as an alternative means of providing an acceptable evidence base for policymaking decisions.
Despite patient-held records being in use for those with mental ill health, there was no acceptable evidence which could assess the benefits or harms.
No measure provides acceptable evidence on all 5 properties.
For instance, while in some cases conference abstracts are sought out as sources of information, other institutions specify that they are not acceptable as evidence for assessment (The Netherlands [ 35], Scotland [ 19]).
This epistemic dissonance radically undercut the effectiveness of the ban, which merely served to proliferate informal networks of wild animal trade and sale rendering the development of acceptable, evidence-based surveillance and mitigation strategies for zoonotic spillovers almost impossible.
