The phrase "acceptable effects" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing outcomes or results that meet a certain standard or criteria in various contexts, such as scientific research, policy analysis, or product evaluation.
Example: "The study concluded that the treatment produced acceptable effects on the participants' health, leading to significant improvements."
Alternatives: "tolerable outcomes" or "satisfactory results."
Considering acceptable effect sizes of 50% for cultivated GMP would counteract current efforts to halt the loss of farmland biodiversity.
Acceptable effect thresholds have to take into account that even current agricultural practices are among the most important pressures on terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystems [43, 44].
Although LoCs should be set independently from acceptable control mortalities for standardised ecotoxicological testing protocols, these must be kept in mind when deciding on acceptable effect sizes for laboratory tests using non-target organisms.
With respect to the magnitude of the acceptable effect observed in the ERA, EFSA considers the level of endangerment as a critical factor, also recognising that this can vary regionally [13].
Any decisions on LoCs for the ERA must therefore be aware of the potential consequences of acceptable effect sizes for the relevant ecological entities and ecosystem functions and services if large-scale and long-term GMO cultivation is envisaged.
The results also showed that both treatments were positive against potential microbial pathogen and in addition, processing by composting had a more acceptable effect on the heterotrophic properties of the derived biosolid (Fig. 13).
Moreover, making use of CM could be costly for organizations because most of the time, CM takes a long time to have an acceptable effect on a failed system or component (Nakagawa 2005).
Additionally, any decision on acceptable effect sizes for laboratory testing should take into consideration that, e.g. for mites, mortalities of 20 25% in the control group are accepted validity criteria for ecotoxicological effect testing of chemicals or plant protection products [50, 51].
More recently, several reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated acceptable effect sizes.
