The aim of that study was merely to sample acceptable complexes (l-RMSD<10 Å) among 2000 rigid body structures, focusing on a data set of (mostly rigid) enzyme complexes.
Our current results are quite promising given the significant increase in the number of good and acceptable complexes retained in the geometric search stage.
The resolution is more than acceptable and complex pieces come out beautifully detailed and immediately usable.
To develop a potentially acceptable, feasible, and complex intervention to support cancer couple dyads, guided by the Medical Research Council's (MRC) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions [ 1, 19], the research team conducted a series of separate but interrelated studies beginning in March 2012.
Indeed, worst-case design is not an acceptable solution for complex algorithms such as MIMO detection.
The goal of the study was to better understand what level of simplification is acceptable when describing complex environments to be used as inputs to EM tools.
However, due to the very large number of structural response analyses traditionally needed for this approach, the computational effort is usually considered to increase above acceptable levels for complex structures such as floating bridges.
Controlled laboratory measurements of simplified BC particles or fresh fossil fuel combustion particles usually provide acceptable comparisons, whereas complex particles from a variety of sources can produce deviations from the reference methods [ 45, 53, 70, 79, 81, 83, 92, 98– 103].
It is important to note that these simulations are typically computationally expensive, consuming several minutes for a single function evaluation of acceptable fidelity for a complex composite part.
