Acceptability was defined as the extent to which each wearable sensor was acceptable to participants [ 14].
Acceptability was investigated by use of bivariate and regression analysis.
Patient acceptability was assessed by questionnaires completed after delivery.
The impact of several factors on eventual acceptability was analysed.
Acceptability was examined in terms of beneficiary, local council, NGO, and donor preferences.
Acceptability was lower and patient pain scores were significantly higher in the office group.
Appetite scores were also recorded at the above time points, and acceptability was measured.
Acceptability was defined using a combination of three consumption, nine safety, and six preference criteria.
The sensory acceptability was measured by a 7-point hedonic scale.
Model acceptability was quantified with Deviance Information Criterion DICC), which penalized model accuracy by the number of retrieved parameters.
The influence of perceived size and firmness on acceptability was also assessed.
