The phrase "acceptability range" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the limits or boundaries of what is considered acceptable in a particular situation or measurement.
Example: "The results of the experiment fell within the acceptability range, indicating that the method used was effective."
Alternatives: "tolerance range" or "acceptable limits".
The calibration of the PET index, resulted in the definition of the thermal acceptability range of: "Cold" for PET values bellow 19 °C; "Neutral" for PET values between 19 °C and 27 °C; "Hot" for PET values greater than 27 °C.
It is noteworthy that this threshold value is well below the lower limit of the AIES acceptability range.
In our study, it is worth noting that the probability of wrongly recommending nab-paclitaxel steeply decreases from 0.04 to 0.01, moving along the bounds of the acceptability range for ICER proposed by AIES.
Based on these findings, nab-paclitaxel can be considered highly cost-effective when compared to the acceptability range for ICER proposed by the Italian Health Economics Association (€25,000 €40,000).
21 Our results show that both the base case ICER and the related extremes of Monte Carlo 95% CI fall below the bounds of the acceptability range per QALY gained (€25,000 €40,000), which was recently proposed by an AIES working group.
When contrasted against the lower and the upper limits (€25,000 and €40,000, respectively) of the acceptability range for ICER proposed by the Italian Health Economics Association AIESS), 31 CEAC highlights that the probability for nab-paclitaxel to be cost-effective is 0.96 and 0.99.
The within- and between run accuracy and precision was evaluated at 2 or 3 concentration levels and fell within the acceptability ranges (see Additional file 2).
Similarly, the calibration of the 2-strain model, the acceptability ranges for prevalence of carriage were different for each age group and serogroup (Tables S6, S7 in Additional file 1).
In the United States, acceptability ranged from 83% to 89% among respondents at a testing facility (study H), emergency department patients, and among men who have sex with men (MSM; studies T, V, W) with 80% of MSM likely to test with their sexual partner (study W).
The acceptability rate ranged from 21 to 98%%.
The acceptability rates range from 80%to97%97 % in most prenatal care clinics [ 11, 12, 41– 41].
