The phrase "acceptability proportion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the ratio or percentage of something that is deemed acceptable, often in research or statistical analysis.
Example: "In our study, the acceptability proportion of the new product was found to be significantly higher than that of the existing alternatives."
Alternatives: "acceptance rate" or "approval ratio".
The least acceptability proportions were found in Adamawa state 599/728 (82.3%) and Kano 521/747 (69.7%).
Despite high levels of reported acceptability, the proportion of women that reported consistent use was only moderate (~50% at Exit).
- be socially acceptable (acceptability pillar).
In this analysis, we considered acceptance of the HIV test by clients to be a measure of acceptability, and number and proportion of women being offered the HIV test to be a measure of effectiveness.
Decision criteria, namely acceptability limits (±10%) and proportion of result contained in the calculated tolerance intervals (80%), were decided on a consensus basis with end-users, whereas no official references were available.
Dealing first with Model 2, which was ranked highest in terms of both preference and acceptability by the largest proportion of people, three quarters (n = 6 of 8) of those who gave this model a low preference score (i.e third preference or least preferred in the afternoon session) said that they would be willing to accept it.
The net health benefit acceptability curve shows the proportion of trials that attained cost-effectiveness for a given strategy for willingness-to-pay thresholds up to $200,000/QALY.
The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve shows the proportion of model runs for which each strategy is cost-effective over a range of potential willingness-to-pay thresholds (ie, λ).
These data are then used to generate a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicating the proportion of simulations for which a particular intervention has a positive net benefit (i.e. it shows the probability that the MRgFUS strategy is cost-effective for different willingnesses-to-pay for a QALY).
We plotted the results on an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio scatter plot and on an acceptability curve to determine the proportion of the simulated results that were below the cost-effectiveness threshold.
