Sentence examples for acceptability of harm from inspiring English sources

In this study there was evidence that study visits and workshops funded by international organisations for the Party Commission had significant influence in swaying their opinion about the acceptability of harm reduction.

Scenarios are proposed for defining the acceptability of risk of harm to soil: the most precautionary one corresponds to no net harm after natural regeneration of soil (i.e. a 1 in 20 chance of exceeding an erosion rate of < 1 t ha− 1 y− 1 and SOC content decline of 0 kg t− 1 y− 1 for mineral soils and a carbon stock decline of 0 t ha− 1 y− 1 for organic soils).

The present study was designed to assess the acceptability and availability of harm-reduction interventions, including needle exchange, education regarding safer drug-ingestion methods, complementary/alternative therapies, and safe places where problem drinkers and drug takers may stay after consumption or may consume substances on the premises.

The five factors were labelled as (1) being quality improvement focused; (2) value of contextual learning; (3) internalising errors regardless of harm; (4) acceptability of questioning more senior healthcare professionals' behaviour and (5) attitude towards open disclosure of errors.

Yet the potential benefits, harms, or acceptability of such a large-scale intervention are not well understood.

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential psychological benefits, harms and acceptability of providing pregnant women with formal risk information for pre-eclampsia.

Yet the potential benefits, harms or acceptability of such a large-scale intervention are not well understood.

The five factors measured students' attitudes towards: (1) being quality improvement focused, (2) internalising errors regardless of harm, (3) value of contextual learning, (4) acceptability of questioning more senior healthcare professionals' behaviour and (5) attitude towards open disclosure.

The consultations provided information on unanticipated harms to the community, allowing changes to the study design to mitigate these harms and increase acceptability of the study.

"Evidence of harm"?

Little chance of harm there.