The phrase "acceptability of decision" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether a particular decision is considered acceptable or appropriate in a given context.
Example: "The committee will evaluate the acceptability of decision based on the established criteria."
Alternatives: "validity of decision" or "appropriateness of decision".
We suggest a method for providing descriptive information about the acceptability of decision alternatives in discrete co-operative group decision-making problems.
The screening instrument acceptability will be assessed with the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument.
96 Modified version of the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument (OADRI) 97: This 12-item questionnaire assesses the acceptability of clinical decision rules by physicians.
The objective of this field study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of decision coaching guided by the OFDG with children and parents considering insulin delivery options for type 1 diabetes management.
Despite the evidence that decision aids support patients in making evidence-informed choices, relatively little is known about the acceptability of decision aids to practitioners or the factors that influence their use of them with patients.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of decision coaching guided by the Ottawa Family Decision Guide with children and parents considering insulin delivery options for type 1 diabetes (insulin pump, multiple daily injections, or standard insulin injections).
SIAs are important in supporting and improving the acceptability of decision-making, but a certain degree of uncertainty will always have to be tolerated.
Nonetheless, the need to find ways of overcoming these barriers has been underscored by a widely held view that evidence-informed program management decision-making may serve to improve the acceptability of decisions to such stakeholder communities [ 5].
Better understanding of the rationale behind decisions by all stakeholders could in turn enhance the legitimacy and acceptability of decisions.[ 5, 14, 15] Similar reasoning could apply to decisionmaking at the individual level; patients and their healthcare team could use such an explicit framework to assist consideration of all the components of complex decisions.
In every health system, decision-makers must ensure that they achieve two key goals in priority setting: legitimacy, defined as the moral authority to make allocation decisions about available resources [ 10]; and fairness, which is achieved when an individual has sufficient reason to accept a priority setting decision because of the acceptability of the decision-making process [ 11].
