The phrase "acceptability of claims" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the validity or credibility of assertions, particularly in academic, legal, or scientific discussions.
Example: "The acceptability of claims made in the research paper was thoroughly evaluated by the peer review committee."
Alternatives: "validity of assertions" or "credibility of statements".
Typical responses to this question maintain that the acceptability of theoretical claims depends upon whether they are true (approximately true, probable, or significantly more probable than their competitors) or whether they "save" observable phenomena.
This result is essentially dependent on the acceptability of Hintikka's claim that EIFL is ontologically committed to individuals only (Subsect. 5.1).
Normative inquiries primarily concern the truth of religious claims, the acceptability of religious values, and other such normative aspects; descriptive inquiries, which are only indirectly involved with the normative elements of religion, are primarily concerned with the history, structure, and other observable elements of religion.
There has, however, been much concern about introducing such cadres, with critics questioning their necessity, their ability to perform all the clinical functions of a physician, their acceptability, and claims that such a program reflects discrimination against rural people.
Distinct claims about the acceptability of tax evasion between centre-right and centre-left coalitions have clearly emerged in Italy in the last decades.
But if, in the historicist spirit, this historical fact is understood to underpin the claim that the acceptability of "styles of reasoning" varies across time then, if a Kuhnian revolution brings with it a shift in the preferred styles of reasoning, there may not be a single conception of rationality that can be used to compare the problem-solving capacities of the competing paradigms.
We observed diverging claims about the frequency and acceptability of such MPH use.
Despite not having been formally evaluated in the endodontic literature, claims have been made regarding the acceptability of the paper point technique (PPT) in estimating the location of the apical foramen (AF).
Once the content of the subjectivist's claim is made explicit, the truth or acceptability of a subjectivist moral judgment is no longer a relative matter.
Acceptability of the manual was mixed in that almost all completers claimed to have read sections of the manual but only two participants in ILS and three in MTS claimed to have read the entire manual.
