The phrase "accept similarities" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the acknowledgment or recognition of common traits or characteristics between two or more subjects.
Example: "In order to foster better communication, we must learn to accept similarities between our cultures."
Alternatives: "acknowledge commonalities" or "embrace resemblances".
In some cases, however, Philolaus may have been content to accept similarities between the properties of number and the properties of things.
The materials, intended for 4-6 year old children, are tools for kindergartens to develop children's self-esteem and self-confidence; to teach them to accept similarities and differences among different people; to recognise actions that hurt others and understand the consequences of those actions; and to learn how to react when exposed to stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination.
An analogical argument is an explicit representation of a form of analogical reasoning that cites accepted similarities between two systems to support the conclusion that some further similarity exists.
Following the widely accepted similarity principle [1] for which structurally similar compounds should act similarly, we have to expect also that similar proteins cavities recognize similar compounds.
Only our addiction to similarity deludes us into accepting similarity as the basis for grouping inscriptions into the several letters, words, and so forth".
For the lexical clustering of tweets, Longest Common Subsequence is a widely accepted similarity metric, however it is also very costly, and therefore not applicable to large data sets such as the ones collected through Twitter.
While there is no one accepted similarity criterion for the definition of gene families, differences in the relative numbers of creations and extinctions among lineages (as well as single gene gains and losses) should not be affected by the definition used.
In addition, there are no generally accepted similarity measures.
"But I would not accept these similarities as coincidence.
We have chosen the threshold of 10% since it represents a reasonable limit for the human capacity of accepting intragroup similarities.
The threshold criterion for accepting sequence similarity as significant was an E-value < 10-10 for BLASTP searches.
